Tiny Matters
Take a dive into the genes, microbes, molecules and other tiny things that have a big impact on our world with Tiny Matters. Join scientists Sam Jones and Deboki Chakravarti as they take apart complex and contentious topics in science and help rebuild your understanding. From deadly diseases to ancient sewers to forensic toxicology, Sam and Deboki embrace the awe and messiness of science and its place in the past, present, and future. Tiny Matters releases new episodes every Wednesday and is brought to you by the American Chemical Society, a non-profit scientific organization advancing chemistry and connecting the broader scientific community. Tiny Matters is produced by Multitude.
Tiny Matters
Extinction: Rethinking the dodo's demise, and could a supervolcano threaten humanity's future?
Around 8 million years ago, an underwater volcano just to the east of Madagascar formed the island of Mauritius. Pigeons on nearby islands set flight and settled on that island. There they continued to evolve, and the dodo bird eventually emerged as its own species: Raphus cucullatus. And tiny Mauritius, with an area of just 720 square miles, was the only place in the entire world where the dodo lived. And it lived a good life, among bats and tortoises and other birds, safe from the predators its ancestors left back on land millions of years before. But in 1598, when sailors from the Netherlands arrived, the dodo’s luck ran out.
On today's Tiny Matters we dive into the history of the bird that everyone loves to make fun of: the dodo. And we’re going to explore some of the work investigating why this bird went extinct and what it was like when it was alive. Then we’ll shift gears and talk about what some people worry will cause a massive extinction in the future — one that might include us: supervolcanoes. These are volcanoes capable of eruptions thousands of times larger than the volcanic eruptions we are most familiar with today. The recent volcanic eruptions in Iceland or the deadly Mount St. Helens eruption in 1980 pale in comparison. These are volcanoes bigger than anything we've experienced as human beings in our recorded history. So are we ready if one comes our way?
Send us your science stories/factoids/news for a chance to be featured on an upcoming Tiny Show and Tell Us episode and to be entered to win a Tiny Matters coffee mug! And, while you're at it, subscribe to our newsletter at bit.ly/tinymattersnewsletter.
Links to the Tiny Show & Tell stories are here and here. Check out the Headline Science video series here.
All Tiny Matters transcripts and references are available here.
Certainly the dodo has got a bat reputation right. Yes, it's been maligned in history. It was a stupid animal, not smart, you know. Basically, it was its own fault that it got eaten and went extinct.
Speaker 2:That's Leon Klassens, professor of vertebrate paleontology and evolution at Maastricht University in the Netherlands, and he wants you to know that dodos were not dodos. Around 40 million years ago, pigeons from Southeast Asia flew across the Indian Ocean, settling on remote islands near Madagascar. Then, around 8 million years ago, an underwater volcano formed another small island in the region. Some of the birds set flight and settled on that island, today named Mauritius, and there they continued to evolve, with the dodo eventually emerging as its own species. Raphis caculatus and tiny Mauritius, with an area of just 720 square miles, about the size of the state of Rhode Island, was the only place in the entire world where the dodo lived, and it lived the good life among bats and tortoises and other birds, safe from the predators. Its ancestors left back on land millions of years before, but in 1598, the dodo's luck ran out. Welcome to Tiny Matters. I'm Sam Jones, and today I'm joined by science writer and video producer Carrie Jansen, who, I'm so psyched, is guest hosting with me for this episode.
Speaker 3:Hi, sam, very happy to be here. I love dodos and I'm so excited to be bringing the dodo some of the respect it deserves. So today on the show we're going to talk about the bird that everyone loves to make fun of, the dodo, and we're going to explore some of the work investigating why this bird went extinct and what it was like when it was alive. And I bet you'll leave this episode finding this bird a whole lot more impressive than popular culture has led you to believe. Then we'll shift gears and talk about what some people worry will cause a massive extinction in the future, one that might include us, and that's supervolcanoes. All right back to our friend, the dodo.
Speaker 3:Remember, for millions of years the dodo didn't have predators. Over time, its ancestors' wings and flight muscles shrank in size. Why waste the energy flying if you don't need to, right? But then in 1598, sailors from the Netherlands arrived on Mauritius. They called the dodo a bunch of names, but Leon told us dodo likely came from one of the names seen in early Dutch writing, dodoersen, which loosely translates to fat behind. The sailors were intrigued by this flightless three-foot-tall bird. It likely weighed around 40 pounds and it had a large skull that we now know, contained a brain similar in proportion to its bird relatives, so regular-sized brain for its body size, which was substantial.
Speaker 1:They thought it was rather peculiar, because there's nothing really that looks like it. So the dodo was considered special from the moment that we have the first records of people laying eyes on them. And it was ecologically naive, so it wasn't afraid of humans or any other predators, because it didn't know any predators, and so they were also reported as easy to catch. So somewhere between the 1680s 1690s it went extinct. So in less than a century after this bird's discovery it has disappeared as a living organism from this planet.
Speaker 2:So you just mentioned, you know they were easy to catch, which of course then my mind goes in certain directions. But what do we know about how these birds went extinct?
Speaker 1:So one of my standard jokes, being Dutch myself, is that I have taken up this line of research so that I can kind of atone, for you know, what my forefathers did, as they stuck dodos in the cooking pot. But that's too simplistic of an image, right? So dodos were certainly eaten, because of the very first report on them got this reputation of actually not being very tasty, even though there's many more reports of them actually being consumed. So I don't think they tasted that bad. But of course humans don't come alone.
Speaker 1:One of these things that they did quite early on these islands that they use as stopover locations for ship replenishments, was that they actually put other animals, organisms, as well as seedlings of things that they like to eat. So even in those earliest reports, they're putting chickens on the island soon enough, right? One or two years later you have goats, you have pigs, you have macaques, these organisms. They of course make their way through that island very quickly, they have this capacity to do so and then what they encounter is a bird that can't fly, therefore undoubtedly nested on the ground and therefore is an easy meal, and is probably this series of introduced species that very, very rapidly for the dodo meant that the population collapsed because of predation, and probably predation of eggs and juveniles especially.
Speaker 3:My family is also Dutch, so I guess I am also atoning for my ancestors through my participation in this podcast episode. Keep in mind this was a time when people weren't thinking about large-scale ecological disasters like the danger of invasive species taking over a new environment and forcing others out. In fact, most people weren't even aware that animals could go extinct.
Speaker 2:The concept of extinction is credited to French naturalist Georges Cuvier, who, in 1796, almost 200 years after the Dutch arrived on Mauritius, proposed that mastodon and mammoth skulls that had been discovered were not just massive elephant skulls, but a different species altogether that had gone extinct. Still, it took a couple more decades for people to get on board with the whole extinction hypothesis, and so there was plenty of chatter that the dodo never existed in the first place.
Speaker 1:You can read about it in these voyages from the 16th, 17th century, but I can read about mermaids and you know sea dragons and other things in there too. So in the 1820s there's a tiny little paper that's written that says no, no, no, we got these dodo remains here in oxford. Another beautiful monograph comes out in the late 1840s, and then by that time mauritius is a british colony, and so these british scientists are telling some of the people that are there well, hey, you know, can you maybe find some of these dodo remains? Still For many decades, no success. And then in 1865, right, you strike dodo gold, so to say, in 1865, dodo bones were found in a swamp on the island.
Speaker 1:So when a rail line for one of the sugar cane plantations was being built, one of the engineers noticed that the laborers were getting bones out of a local marsh. The bones look kind of peculiar. He took him to the hat master of the school. That person went hey, yes, that's Dodo and fantastic. That news went all over the world and of course all these British scientists clambered to be the one to get to describe that.
Speaker 2:Ultimately, British paleontologist Sir Richard Owen won out. Owen is probably best known for coining the term dinosaur a couple decades earlier.
Speaker 3:Owen wrote a book called Memoir of the Dodo, and you can actually read a scan of it online at the Biodiversity Heritage Library. There are pictures. But for the next 140 years the swamp where the bones were found remained untouched. Until 2005, when its rediscovery yielded mainly extinct giant tortoise bones, but also a significant number of dodo bones and miscellaneous other bones.
Speaker 3:But all of these bones, of course, were churned up together, and Leon told us that most of the dodo bones were actually hind limbs and other sturdy bones, not the fragile ones that you'd find in the skull or even vertebrae. Only one complete dodo skeleton with all the bones belonging to the same individual has ever been found, and it wasn't on any recent digs. It was discovered in 1904 by an amateur naturalist named Louise Etienne Thirieu, who also happened to be a big-time hairdresser in the Mauritius capital as his day job. That one complete dodo skeleton is essential for Leon's work. He's an anatomist focused on functional morphology, so studying how an organism's anatomy dictates its movement. A full skeleton from one bird allows him to model what its muscles may have looked like and things like how quickly the dodo may have been able to run.
Speaker 1:If I go to a graveyard and we take, you know, person A's lower leg and person B's upper leg and we kind of, you know, average that together into something that looks like a human, and it will look quite good. But it's not quite the same right, Because maybe really long lower legs belong with really short upper legs or the other way around. So having then that one unique specimen here that was found by that hairdresser more than a century ago is a fantastic thing.
Speaker 2:As we chat, Leon actually has a 3D printed version of that complete dodo skeleton towering behind him.
Speaker 1:So one of the things that we noticed is that the relative proportions of the limbs, when you compare that with pigeons, is not all that different, right? So they're not doing something fundamentally different by lengthening or shortening an upper leg bone, a lower leg, the tarsum and the tarsus, the middle foot bones, or anything like that. The bones are fairly sturdy. A dodo would be quite capable of running at a decent pace. At the same time, it's not a roadrunner, right? It's not a cursorial bird that's built for speed. In fact, I would argue that it's probably built for navigating this really complex terrain with a lot of undergrowth, with big boulders and so forth, and it had the hind limbs that allowed it to do that really well. Right, with proper offsetting of muscles to have optimal leverage.
Speaker 2:In addition to ongoing functional morphology work, scientists have been able to study the proteins and DNA in dodo bones, allowing them to hypothesize that they likely munched on nuts, seeds, fruits and roots and that they were in fact, as Leon put it, robust upscaled pigeons. I love that. Yeah, me too. Researchers fully sequenced the dodo's genome for the first time and found that it's remarkably similar to the Nicobar pigeon, a brightly colored pigeon with purple, orange and grayish-blue feathers, as opposed to the grayscale rock pigeon that most of us are used to seeing. The Nicobar pigeon still lives on islands throughout the Indian Ocean and Western Pacific, but although genetically there's a ton of overlap, morphologically there are stark differences.
Speaker 1:When you look at the skull, in the beginning people thought it must be related to birds of prey, right? They actually thought a dodo was more like a vulture with this massive hooked beak that it had. That, of course, is not the case. But then the question, right of course how does it feed on some of these seeds? Well, those are great questions that we're grappling with in some way. Of course, now that we have some of these dodo skulls digitized, you can actually do finite element analysis and other types of reconstructions to get an idea of forces and things that are possible and maybe are not possible. But you basically just have a large, ground-dwelling seed-eating organism that is large and rotund, so it can store a lot of food, and that also means that it makes it very, very sturdy and very resilient to climatic fluctuations.
Speaker 2:When Leon says resilient, he means it. Mauritius isn't an easy environment to survive in During the summer months. It's known for its cyclones that bring heavy rain and winds that can damage the vegetation the dodos ate. Actually, looking at cross-sections of dodo bones, you can see tiny lines called growth arrest lines that look somewhat like rings on a tree. They're lines of increased bone density caused by bone growth stopping. The dodo bones showed repeated lines of arrested growth and the researchers believe they're due to harsh summer months when the birds would starve, but once winter came around, they'd once again be able to haul in the nutrition they needed and their bones would continue to grow.
Speaker 3:So dealing with annual cyclones that knock out your food sources is already pretty rough, and on top of that, there's now compelling evidence that around 4,200 years ago, there was a mega drought on Mauritius that lasted for about 60 years, leading to mass mortalities on the island, but in the end the dodo was still standing. So dodos weren't unfit for survival at all. In fact, they were great at it, they were doing fine. They just weren't ready for us humans. Now where have we heard that before?
Speaker 2:In the things that you've learned about the dodo. Do you see anything like the dodo story replaying in real time with other species today?
Speaker 1:To some extent yes, certainly, as a scientist, I'm really worried about the environmental, ecological disruptions loss of habitat, loss of species, over consumption, right over fishing, over hunting. I think the dodo especially is and this is along the lines of research that we're very actively engaged with now right that the dodo is a fantastic model system. It confined in a very small island. When you put that in the context of a modern biodiversity crisis and we think about forests and rainforests right being fragmented more and more, ultimately becoming, you know, little islands, then I think like well, it'd be good to know more about the dodo and the case history of the island of Mauritius, so that we can see what does or doesn't apply to some of these modern biodiversity crises and if you can get some predictive value from that also.
Speaker 2:So have you changed your mind about the dodo yet? At the very least, we hope what you learned will inspire you to remove dodo from your insult vocabulary, because, truly, I'd be proud to be as resilient as the dodo.
Speaker 3:And now we know that dodo just means you have a fluffy bottom, and who doesn't love that Great point?
Speaker 2:We're going to really take a hard turn and talk not about a past extinction but the potential of a future one, and we're going to do that with Brian Walsh, an editorial director at Voxcom overseeing a section called Future Perfect. Before that, he was a foreign correspondent and climate change correspondent for Time magazine.
Speaker 3:Brian has covered climate change, emerging infectious diseases like the original SARS, risk of nuclear war, concerns about an artificial intelligence takeover, and as he was doing all of this, he discovered that there was a growing field of work around the study of existential risks, things that could possibly end human civilization or alter it dramatically, and that inspired him to write the book End Times a brief guide to the end of the world, which came out in 2019.
Speaker 4:And it was a really fascinating reporting experience to go through both big natural risks like your asteroids, your supervolcanoes, as well as your new technological risks things human beings could do to themselves, whether that was one that already existed, like nuclear weapons, or whether it was new ones on the horizon, like AI or even sort of new forms of biotechnology that could create germs way worse than anything we could get out of nature.
Speaker 3:There's obviously a lot that we could have discussed with Brian, but today the focus is supervolcanoes.
Speaker 4:The very term supervolcano. It's not really a scientific term, as I discovered, like it came out of, I think, a documentary actually, and like a sort of amateur scientist who put the name out there and it got picked up and you know, actual volcanologists. I don't think really like the term supervolcano because it sounds like something that should be. It sounds like the Sharknado of science almost.
Speaker 2:I was just going to say it feels very Sharknado when you say it yeah.
Speaker 4:Exactly so. You know there's a real sense that it's hard to take it seriously because it seems so outlandish and it's really often the subject of your kind of more questionably scientifically accurate documentaries and things like that.
Speaker 3:We're going to use the colloquial term supervolcano throughout the episode, but you should know that some volcanologists prefer to just use the term supereruption, which is defined as a magnitude of greater than eight on the volcanic explosivity index, which is a real thing, and that means that more than 1,000 cubic kilometers, or 240 cubic miles, of volcanic rock, including ash, is spewed into the air.
Speaker 4:And that's thousands and thousands of times larger than the volcanic eruptions that we know about. You know, this is not like Mount St Helens back in 1980. It's not like Pinatubo in the Philippines in the 1990s. It's not the kind of things you see in Iceland, for instance. These are volcanoes bigger than anything we've experienced as human beings in our recorded history.
Speaker 3:Supervolcano. Volcanoes are kind of hard to wrap your brain around, but we're going to try through the lens of Mount Toba, which was located in what's now the Indonesian island Sumatra. 74,000 years ago, mount Toba exploded.
Speaker 4:And to give you a sense of when we say explosion, when we say a super volcano explosion, the estimation is that the eruption ejected something like 2,800 cubic kilometers of volcanic material, of ash, of rock, of silicate, and just to put that in perspective, that would be enough to cover the entire state of Texas in nearly 30 feet of ash.
Speaker 2:So, of course, the area in close proximity to a super eruption would almost immediately be obliterated, but these eruptions affect the rest of the world as well, because they shoot out thousands of tons of sulfur dioxide. That sulfur dioxide is converted to sulfuric acid, which then condenses to form sulfate aerosols that float around in our stratosphere and do a number of things. They can reflect sunlight, leading to cooler temperatures and altered weather patterns. They can take part in chemical reactions that deplete the ozone and can cause serious respiratory damage for organisms breathing them in.
Speaker 3:There are scientists who believe that the Mount Toba eruption may have been about as close as human beings have ever gotten to actual extinction, and that a global volcanic winter may have nearly wiped out humanity and led to such reduced populations that we experienced a genetic bottleneck and our species only really genetically differentiated over the last 74,000 years. But more recently, that argument has been increasingly debated, based on new climate models that question how dramatic the global cooling and decreased rainfall may have been, arguing that some parts of the world could have seen little change. In March of this year, a study of an archaeological site in northwest Ethiopia suggested that early humans there were able to adapt to arid conditions brought on by the volcanic eruption, altering their diets and possibly even changing how they hunted, and that may have changed how the population traveled and spread as well. Scientists are still working to understand all of the impacts.
Speaker 2:Much, much, much more recently, in 1815, there was another big eruption, not as big as Mount Toba, but still very significant, and that was Mount Tembora in Indonesia, and that led to the year without a summer, and that's actually something before I read your book that I had heard of, I think, because that phrase is so like it really sticks with you. There's something very eerie about the concept of a year without a summer.
Speaker 4:Absolutely so. 1815 is Mount Timbor, also Indonesia. There's a sort of a pattern you might be seeing here. A lot of volcanoes are located in and around Indonesia. It's part of that Pacific Ring of Fire. So the eruption there was the most powerful we have in recorded history. The eruption ejected about 150 cubic kilometers of material. You know the entire top of the mountain collapsed into this large hole we call a caldera and you know the immediate eruption killed tens of thousands of people in and around the area in Indonesia. Thousands more died from the effect of ash falling, the effect of immediate disease caused by the simple destruction of crops and infrastructure.
Speaker 3:Although Tambora was not considered a super volcano, it came in at a 7 on the Volcanic Explosivity Index. Remember Toba was likely an 8. So temperatures dropped and the sky changed, particularly in North America and Asia.
Speaker 4:There was a scientist in Britain who just made it a daily habit of his to record what does the weather look like, what does the sky look like outside? In 1816, the year following the eruption, he didn't see a single sunny day in Britain and, like Britain, not the most sunny country to begin with, but that's still a lot of days without sunlight. And you know, what you saw was just widespread crop failures all through Europe, north America. You had food shortages, economic disruption this would go in Asia as well. You had summers that had frosts. That year you had snow. In July you had droughts that made that farming crisis worse. And all that humanity could do is try to endure it until over the next couple of years. You know, eventually the cloud is sort of blocking, the sunlight, begins to dissipate and, you know, temperatures get back to normal. But that gave us just like a small taste of what this experience would have been like if it were on a supervolcano scale, which this wasn't to be sure.
Speaker 3:Right now, despite some clickbait headlines you may have seen, there are not any supervolcanoes that we know of, but could there be one in our future?
Speaker 4:We know that they could happen in the future, but it's incredibly hard to know will they happen? When will they happen, what are the signs and even how to prepare for them. Like, volcanoes and supervolcanoes are very different than, say, asteroids, where we have a tracking system, we know where asteroids are coming from. We've actually gotten quite good at mapping and charting and predicting all the ones that we may face over the next century, so we can feel pretty clear that that's not going to be something that's going to happen to us in anything like the conceivable future. Geology, volcanology much more unknown. We know much less about the inner workings of the Earth beneath our feet than we do about the movement of the heavens above us, and that does make us vulnerable. Also, we haven't put anywhere near the kind of money or attention into preparing for it as we have for some of the risks.
Speaker 2:Is there anything other than really becoming a lot better at predicting what is an indicator of a supervolcano or a massive volcanic event? I mean.
Speaker 4:Yellowstone is a good example of what can be done really at this point. So Yellowstone is probably one of the most monitored volcanic systems out there. It is, USGS has an actual team that is doing this all the time, and what you are looking for is seismic activity. That would be the thing that would occur before an eruption, whether you're talking about a super volcano or a smaller volcano. You're looking for a sort of increase in frequency, strength of the kind of earthquakes that are always happening to a degree in a place like that. You're looking for some indication of like. Is there an increase in volcanic gases, Anything like that? Could you see? Use satellites to look for ground uplift, Any change in the Earth's surface that may indicate some kind of magma movement underneath the volcano? And you know a lot of this also goes into looking at historical data.
Speaker 3:So the more we understand about past supervolcanic eruptions, the better we'll be able to assess our risk today and if we humans want to survive a future super eruption. Brian says right now we should be thinking about what we'd need. Where would we live? What would we eat? One option might be mushrooms and other fungi. Unlike plants, they don't rely on sunlight to grow. They feed on organic matter. In fact, following the massive extinction 66 million years ago that killed off non-avian dinosaurs, fungi thrived even though more than half of plant species died off.
Speaker 4:There's an old saying that, like you know, human civilization only exists as long as geology consents, and that can be changed anytime, and so this is one where it's both incredibly unlikely and yet it's the one we're almost powerless to stop. At the end of the day, we should definitely be doing more about, you know, more ordinary, more common volcanoes in terms of risk awareness, in terms of predicting such that we can get people out of the way in the immediate aftermath. But you know, the last thing about this, I think, is that it also did just make me realize how insignificant I am as an individual against like both the sweep of billions and billions of years and also the sheer force of this planet, and how random so many things are really, you know.
Speaker 2:So, yeah, it would be hard to fully, fully prep for a super eruption, at least with what we know right now. But why not start by being more prepared for smaller but still devastating eruptions which, like Brian mentioned, we're actually not very prepared for, and then we can consider a future where we're all successful at cultivating fungi. I like mushrooms, so that's fine with me. Same. All right, carrie, are you ready? First tiny show and tell I'm very ready. Do you want to go first or do you want me to go first? You go first, I can do that.
Speaker 2:So in the episode, when Leon told us about how, in 1865, there was a rail line for one of the sugar cane plantations that was being built and then one of the engineers noticed that laborers were getting a bunch of bones out of the marsh, it reminded me of two things. So the first was that we have a tiny show and tell us episode and it came out just a couple months ago in July where we talked about how the late 1700s to the early 1900s was this time of industrialized grave robbing, and so there would be battlefields in Europe that should have no fewer than like 10,000 skeletons buried and archaeologists would go in to excavate and maybe find a few. And so the question was where did they go? And it appears to have led back to the beet sugar industry, which is booming, yes, in the 19th century. So I'm going to leave a link to the beet sugar industry, which is booming, yes, in the 19th century. So I'm going to leave a link to the episode description, if you're intrigued to check it out.
Speaker 3:Oh, my goodness, no, this is. I am so intrigued when you say industrial grave robbing. That suggests to me quite a large scale, which is both worrying and fascinating.
Speaker 2:Yep, it is. That comes through in the episode as well. Okay, well, I can't wait. And so then, the second thing that I thought of was a finding from August of this year of the smallest humerus so upper arm bone ever found from an adult hominin. So researchers think it belonged to the tiny Homo floresiensis I always say that wrong, I always want to say florensis, but I think it's floresiensis species, which are sometimes nicknamed hobbits.
Speaker 2:Bones and teeth from the species were first discovered 20 years ago inside a cave on the Indonesian island of Flores, and they were somewhere between 100,000 and 60,000 years old, and the researchers predicted that the being they belonged to would have been somewhere around three and a half feet tall. And so, of course, you might think like how could you tell if it was a child or if it was an adult? The main way to assess that is if the bones had stopped growing, and in this case they had, and then they also ruled out growth disorders as well. And then another batch of those fossils turned up in 2016, and they dated back to around 700,000 years ago. And now you have this recent discovery, which is unique because this humerus is the smallest of any adult hominin ever found, and they're predicting that the Homo floresiensis individual would have been less than three feet four inches tall as an adult, which is very small.
Speaker 3:Wow, so how long does that make the humerus then? Because?
Speaker 4:like.
Speaker 3:I'm looking at my upper arm right now. I'm guessing it's about a foot long.
Speaker 2:The thing was that they actually found a fragment of it, like a significant portion of it, and in the image we always link to everything we discuss in the Tiny Show and Tell Us in the episode description. But it's fitting in a researcher's hand.
Speaker 3:I see Wow, okay, yeah, that's fascinating.
Speaker 2:You could go on a deep dive about this early human species, and there's a lot of debate about if actually this was a species that evolved from Homo erectus that you know showed up on this island and then, for whatever reason, adapted pretty quickly to be much, much smaller.
Speaker 3:Yeah, it's always interesting when we think we have something figured out and then we find something new and it's like, oh wait, but I guess that's science isn't it.
Speaker 2:That's science. All right, Carrie, are you ready?
Speaker 3:Yes, is it my turn? It's your turn. Okay, all right, sam, as you know, I make a video series called Headline Science. These are short videos about interesting chemistry research. You might see them in your YouTube shorts feed or on social media. They're on the ACS website as well, and I want to share a recent video that we made that I think is pretty cool. It's about space ice ice in space.
Speaker 3:I now realize that makes cool a pun and I'm sorry, but anyways, in this video we can see a lab where scientists replicate the kinds of ice particles that are found in deep space, which is wild to me, and they're interested in that because scientists think space ice is where prebiotic molecules formed, so these are the basic chemicals required for life. So they actually make this kind of ice and then they bombard it with high-energy electrons and photons to see what happens. Because that's actually what happens in space. These cosmic rays are zooming around, plowing into ice particles, and so in the video we actually get a peek inside their lab, and you can see the scientists and some of the equipment they use to do this. My colleague, vanjie Kuntz, worked with them to get this footage, so I'll just show you a little piece of it here.
Speaker 3:Yeah, it's really cool. We love highlighting cool chemistry research. We want it to be as accessible as possible but still be able to showcase, you know, real science in a satisfying way, and we've got a bunch of other videos out on the website too and on YouTube. So, yeah, a whole variety of things there's like. There's shape-shifting crystals, little slime, shooting creatures, micro machines lots of good stuff.
Speaker 3:Headline Science has a bunch of longer and by longer I mean like three-minute videos as well as these shorts, and so we'll link to both so you can just kind of check out what's out there and, by the way, tiny Matters listeners we love it when researchers send us their videos, so if any of you are doing science that looks really cool or weird, please tell us about it. I would love that Our email is acs underscore video at acsorg Wonderful.
Speaker 2:And I will put that in the description as well.
Speaker 3:Thanks for tuning into this week's episode of Tiny Matters, a production of the American Chemical Society. This week's script was written by Sam, who is also our executive producer, and it was edited by me, keri Jansen and by Michael David. It was's script was written by Sam, who is also our executive producer, and it was edited by me, carrie Jansen and by Michael David. It was fact-checked by Michelle Boucher. The Tiny Matters theme and episode sound design is by Michael Simonelli and the Charts and Leisure team.
Speaker 2:Thanks so much to Leon Klassens and Brian Walsh for joining us. A reminder that we have a newsletter Sign up for updates on new Tiny Matters episodes, videos from interviews, science stories. We can't stop thinking about previews of future episodes and other content that we think you'll really like. I've put a link in this episode's description We'll see you next time.
